Station Road, Sidcup

How can we help?

Please fill in this form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Please enter your name
Please enter your email address
Please enter your telephone number
Please enter a question
Please let us know how you heard about us
Please enter the verification code

We’ll only use this information to handle your enquiry and we won’t share it with any third parties. For more details see our Privacy Policy

Commercial Property Owner Charged for Non-Existent Drainage Services

A commercial property owner who for years shelled out for drainage bills that it was never obliged to pay must be reimbursed every penny. That was the effect of an important High Court ruling in which utility companies were found to have been unjustly enriched by charging for services that were never provided.

The case concerned premises on an industrial estate. Surface water from the site discharged into a sewer that passed beneath roads on the estate and other land before arriving at an outfall into a brook. The site's owner paid the utility companies for drainage services on the assumption that the sewer was a public facility. It eventually stopped paying, however, and launched proceedings.

Ruling on the case, the Court found that the utility companies had failed to establish on the evidence that the sewer was a public, as opposed to a private, facility. It followed that they were never entitled to charge for the sewer's use and never provided the supposed services for which payment was levied.

The charges had been paid on a mistaken basis and the utility companies had been unjustly enriched by demanding and accepting payment for services to which they were not entitled. It was an aggravating feature of the case that they appeared to have raised charges during a lengthy period when their own records did not indicate that they were entitled to do so. They were ordered to reimburse the owner to the tune of over £150,000, plus interest.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.