Station Road, Sidcup

How can we help?

Please fill in this form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Please enter your name
Please enter your email address
Please enter your telephone number
Please enter a question
Please let us know how you heard about us
Please enter the verification code

We’ll only use this information to handle your enquiry and we won’t share it with any third parties. For more details see our Privacy Policy

Film Studios Faced by Piracy Scourge Granted Internet Blocking Orders

Wholesale copyright infringement – otherwise known as piracy – has been a feature of the internet almost since its inception. In coming decisively to the aid of six major film and television studios, however, the High Court showed that perpetrators, even if based abroad, have nowhere to hide.

The case concerned five websites that provided their users with links to others from which copyright-protected movies and TV shows, which would otherwise have only been available on subscription, could be downloaded free of charge. Although the websites did not provide the content themselves, they created a user-friendly environment for users, complete with accessible catalogues of copyright works.

The studios launched proceedings under Section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, seeking orders requiring the UK's six largest internet service providers (ISPs) to block user access to the websites. The ISPs did not oppose the application.

Granting the orders sought, the Court noted that the websites were all operated from abroad. There was no evidence that any of them had a legitimate purpose and the studios' efforts to contact their operators had not resulted in their activities being curtailed. The operators clearly knew, or had to be taken to know, that they were providing access to copyright works that had been placed on the internet without the studios' consent.

The websites were operated for profit. English was their default language and their services were clearly targeted at UK users. By providing links to pirated works, they purported to grant rights that were not theirs to give. They positively encouraged and facilitated infringing acts of copying by users. Given that the public had no legitimate interest in downloading infringing copies of copyright works to the detriment of the studios, the orders were both justified and necessary.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.