Station Road, Sidcup
Close

How can we help?

Please fill in this form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Please enter your name
Please enter your email address
Please enter your telephone number
Please enter a question
Please let us know how you heard about us
Please enter the verification code

We’ll only use this information to handle your enquiry and we won’t share it with any third parties. For more details see our Privacy Policy

Inaccuracies In Your Tax Return Are Serious - Seek Professional Advice

Any inaccuracy when filling in your tax return can have severe consequences, so it really does make sense to seek professional assistance. The point was powerfully made by the case of a financier who narrowly escaped a stiff financial penalty after failing to declare all of his income and benefits.

After being made redundant by an investment bank, the man failed to include in his self-assessment tax return a severance payment of £176,738 he had received. He also made no reference to the bank having written off a loan to him of £143,420. As a result, his Income Tax liability was understated by £68,015.

After HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) launched an enquiry and discovered the omissions, he was required to pay the additional tax due, plus interest and a penalty of £23,805. Given that his tax affairs were very straightforward, HMRC asserted that it was unlikely he had made an innocent mistake.

The man acknowledged the inaccuracies but asserted that he had made every effort to complete his return correctly, without professional help. He said that he had relied on documents provided to him by the bank and his subsequent employer and that he was unaware prior to HMRC's inquiry that the severance lump sum and the written-off loan were taxable.

In upholding his appeal against the penalty, the First-tier Tribunal ruled that HMRC had failed to establish that the omissions were deliberate or that he had consciously or intentionally chosen not to find out his true tax position. Given that HMRC had not advanced an alternative case that the omissions were careless, the penalty was overturned.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.