Station Road, Sidcup

How can we help?

Please fill in this form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Please enter your name
Please enter your email address
Please enter your telephone number
Please enter a question
Please let us know how you heard about us
Please enter the verification code

We’ll only use this information to handle your enquiry and we won’t share it with any third parties. For more details see our Privacy Policy

Letting Agency Fined for Breaches of Consumer Rights Legislation

Professionals who deal directly with the public are subject to a battery of consumer protection rules and failing to comply with them can be costly, both in financial and reputational terms. In one case, a letting agency that neglected to display a list of its fees in a position where customers were likely to see it was hit with a £5,000 fine.

The penalty was imposed under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 by a local authority after a trading standards officer visited the agency's premises. A list of the agency's fees was displayed in the window, but was facing inwards, away from the street. The list was in any event non-compliant with the Act.

The agency was given an opportunity to amend and reposition the list but, when the officer visited again about a month later, it had been removed from the window. It was lying on a manager's desk, facing away from customers. The agency also did not have in place a notice stating that it was not a member of the Client Money Protection Scheme, which provides for payment of compensation to clients should an agent misappropriate their rent, deposits or other funds.

The local authority initially imposed two £5,000 monetary penalties, but subsequently conceded that it only had the power to impose one. In challenging the fine before the First-tier Tribunal (FTT), the agency argued that it was disproportionate and heavy-handed. It had cooperated with the officer and the list had only been removed from the window for about four hours so that it could be amended and retyped.

In dismissing the appeal, however, the FTT noted that the list's absence from the window was more than momentary and that it had in any event been non-compliant. Although £5,000 was the maximum penalty that could be imposed, there was no evidence that it would put the agency in financial difficulty. The fine would also encourage letting agents generally to be prompt in remedying breaches of the Act.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.