Station Road, Sidcup

How can we help?

Please fill in this form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Please enter your name
Please enter your email address
Please enter your telephone number
Please enter a question
Please let us know how you heard about us
Please enter the verification code

We’ll only use this information to handle your enquiry and we won’t share it with any third parties. For more details see our Privacy Policy

Trade Marks Infringed By Disassembling and Selling Charm Bracelet Links

Is the purchaser of a product sold under a trade mark entitled to take it apart and sell its component parts under the trade mark? The High Court considered that issue in resolving a dispute between rival manufacturers of bracelet charms.

An Italian company manufactured high-end bracelets consisting of links which could be detached from one another and relinked in any order to suit the wearer. Although some of the links were made of gold and precious stones, the product required the use of base links that were made of stainless steel and bore the company's logo, which was protected by trade marks.

The company launched proceedings against a UK-based rival whose charms were compatible with its bracelets. Trading on eBay, the rival had, amongst other things, bought and disassembled the company's bracelets, removing the base links which were sold on bundled together with its own charms.

In upholding the company's infringement claim, the Court noted that it was in the nature of its bracelets that purchasers are permitted to disassemble them into their individual links. However, it had established a legitimate reason for its objection to the rival's onward sale of base links under the trade mark.

The Court noted that base links were sold by the rival, in combination with its own charms, in blister packs and plastic bags which did not convey an impression of quality. That compared with the company's elegant packaging, which presented an image of luxury. The packaging employed by the rival was in those circumstances likely to damage the company's reputation.

In also upholding the company's passing off claim, the Court found that the rival had in some instances used the company's logo in relation to its own goods. It was not disputed that the company owned the goodwill in the trade marks and at least some of the rival's customers were likely to have mistakenly assumed that, having been packaged together, the rival's charms came from the company.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.